The system of education replicates our expectations of what skills and knowledge will be valuable in the future. One part of society holds the belief that all students should pick majors, which they prefer. Whilst others think that every student has to study subjects, that will have practical use in the future, such as those related to science and technology. This essay will discuss both points of view and express my attitude to that issue.
On the one hand, the freedom of choice provided to students is essential condition for future success in life in general. Within the last century, approaches to education have been continuously evolving and recently scientists have revealed that the main driver of personal and social development is ability of individuals to think creatively. However, I believe that any restrictions in ability to pick something influence creativity, thus, those who choose majors by themselves have higher potential and value for society.
On the other hand, the technical development is essential for our future, as a result, science and technology professionals are in high demand. Therefore, the government should stimulate students to pick majors, which could provide sound knowledge base for students in those valuable fields. For instance, the educational governors of Estonia has found it useful in some cases to limit ability of students to choose subjects in order to increase the number of potential specialists in science and technology spheres and they received considerable results. I believe that it is an extreme measure and could be employed only in the case of emergency.
In conclusion, both approaches have some positive as well as negative consequences. In my opinion, even though some specialists are in higher demand and theoretically some subjects will be more useful for society in the future, if students had not picked that majors by themselves they would have lower odds to be successful in that fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ion, both approaches have some positive as well as negative consequences. In my opinion, e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26751592357 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8371989279 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541401273885 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7835426185 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.230769231 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190599603085 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671887909325 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504475967673 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118108075668 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459288783365 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.