The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
International experts have proposed many solves to tackle global environmental issues. Although rise significant price in fuel is a useful method to fighting climate change. But I strongly belive that this is not a best way to alleviate environmental problems.
On the one hand, government in many developing countries are extremely like to raise taxes on fuel, this bring a very big resource of money and decrease significantly a number of emission in the atmospheres. This means that all population areas would be able to live on the fresh air and in order to convenient conditions for plants, animals could an convernient developments. In London city where replace a number of cars by useful traffic vehicles after the government of their country applied restricted policies in the special vehicles to prevented by global warming. Finally, the government should be create maximum pressure for fuel companies to protect general environmental problems.
On the other hand, in the recent years the environmental pollution lead to consequences of many serious diseases, sea level problems, even evaporation of nature environment for almost animals or damage a large number of plants in over the world. Thus, we also need a comprehensive measures practically for general social problems. Firstly, the government should allocate resources to development of alternative energy sources. Secondly, the striking establishment of rules in the sea areas which could stopped unconscious actions. As the result, in Singapore, green cities is the biggest gifts for their government to effort achieve sustainable development continuously at this time .
In conclusion, although raising cost of fuel would be an positive measure, but we need to looking for more effective methods to solve a wider environmental issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to tackle global environmental issues. Although rise significant price in fuel is a use...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... But I strongly belive that this is not a best way to alleviate environmental pro...
^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...nt conditions for plants, animals could an convernient developments. In London cit...
^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'created'?
Suggestion: created
...ming. Finally, the government should be create maximum pressure for fuel companies to ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nvironment for almost animals or damage a large number of plants in over the world. Thus, we also...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 684, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...le development continuously at this time . In conclusion, although raising cost...
^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... although raising cost of fuel would be an positive measure, but we need to lookin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50896057348 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13667411278 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627240143369 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2987548926 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.230769231 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100282948468 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398418503573 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491192522459 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793124547816 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586628725765 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.