Some people believe that government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Other think that building more and wider road is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your option.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Other think that building more and wider road is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your option.

It is true that traffic congestion has been increased in many recent years, remained a controversy problem to social and put much pressure on the authority of some countries in the world. While people believe that government should invest money on construction train and subway network to reduce traffic congestion. I would argue that expanding and improving road system is the best solutions to tackle with this problem.
On the one hand, there are strong reasons that construction train and subway lines to alleviate traffic congestion. Firstly, more people will be encourage to leave their home by using public transportations. As vital road in city centre has expanded, people could choose those is the best option to go more quickly to the destinations, so less people in main road and pressure to drivers. Secondly, rail way and subway systems can be built on underground to deliver goods across the world more easily, profit for private companies as well as those countries are inevitable, would be a practical measure to contribute in growth economic.
On the other hand, as the road in the city centre are expanding and improve that is a much more effective way to deal with traffic congestion. On one reason is that people in outskirts of the city can be work in footpath. This make volume of private cars have a considerable decline in rush hours, even decreasing injuries and unfortunate accidents on road. On the other reason is that wider road is a essential part to enable drivers to go to destination without facing with traffic jam, make more safety in anytime.
In conclusion, I believe that should prioritize building and widening roads rather than spending money on rail way and metro lines in order to reduce traffic congestion.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leaving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: leaving
... Firstly, more people will be encourage to leave their home by public transportations. A...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...go more quickly to the destinations, so less people in main road and pressure to dri...
^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the other reason is that wider road is a essential part to enable drivers to go ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05136986301 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76591082891 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537671232877 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6700120429 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.916666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388530016561 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139153690914 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130873205215 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249211591239 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875488776586 0.056905535591 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.