The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that governments can avert the environmental issues that put our world in jeopardy just by increasing the cost of fuel. However i think that it is just one of the most significant policy and we need more.
To commence with, one evident explanation why decreasing the consumption of fossil fuel is not a best option is somewhat related to policies and legislations of authorities. In other words, office-bearers not only prevent dwellers utilizing fossil fuel but also foster to plant more trees, to recycle, to ultilize energy-efficient items, to limit using plastic bags which act as a foremost castalyst in damaging the environment and so forth. In addition, banning deforestations plays a significant role in this serious matter by virtue of the importance of trees which can suck emmisions and release oxygen into atmostphere.
Another underlying factor to take under advisement is the efforts as well as the cooperation between citizens and office-holders. It is indispensable to understand that obeying environmental laws is necessary. For example, in case farmers clear forests to make way for farming or other their own purposes, regardless of the regulations, protecting environment will never be sucessfully mitigated. Morever, human acticities in daily life also make huge contributions to tackle this global matter. Therefore, it is substantiable to teach and guide youngsters, the next generation, do tangible activities in order to control environmental disasters, violent storms, prolonged droughts and other extreme weather conditions.
In conclusion, although increasing the cost of fuel can control enviromental problem, i totally opine that the other two aforementioned elements are more crucial to go forward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...dy just by increasing the cost of fuel. However i think that it is just one of the most...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...by increasing the cost of fuel. However i think that it is just one of the most s...
^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...g the consumption of fossil fuel is not a best option is somewhat related to poli...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57303370787 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34005130381 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670411985019 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2398934906 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.272727273 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176466631622 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057241693245 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695196101575 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106283745411 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484745789239 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.