the best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While team sport is an effective approach to teach the cooperating skills, it also exposes the students to the risk of injury. I believe there are several safer ways that could help them establish teamwork skillset as sports do.
Team sports teach students fundamental rules to work with others in a strategic and cooperative way. Sports players learned from following sportsmanship style etiquette. They need to understand that he is part of the team and is committed to helping the team win, regardless of his individual goal. Showing respect to each member and valuing their contribution are highly recommended. Besides, disciplining yourself and being reliable, make sure others could always count on you. Imagine that you are on a football team. You won't like to pass the ball to someone who is arrogant or frequently loses the ball.
However, injuries and conflicts are quite common in sports, which makes it less appealing to those who want to practice in a safer environment. For them, plenty of alternatives could be preferable, such as group work in project-oriented classes or community volunteering activities. In the process of writing and carrying out a business plan, for example, students would learn how to allocate tasks according to personal capabilities, balance the goal of the project and the individuals, be flexible, and help each other when unexpected events come out, which is quite common in the real world. With safer and fulfilled teamwork practices, it could not only build cooperation skills but also let them experience the actual business circumstances.
In conclusion, team sports are useful but dangerous. There are other choices that could bring the same, if not better, results for different preferences.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29749103943 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91938069169 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641577060932 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0403873586 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176189951874 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066946727675 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693920244405 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11868389939 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802695854088 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.