Students at schools and universities learn far more from lessons with teachers than from other sources (such as the Internet and television). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since students spend a great deal of her growing-up years in school, teachers are widely considered the foremost knowledge source. However, the readily available Internet has enabled varieties of new educational approaches. A growing number of children are turning to it for individualized or more preferable materials.
It is true that most students learn by following the instruction of teachers, which is especially important when students are young and lack the skill set for self-study. Based on professional teaching skills, teachers could employ creativity, patience, and communication skills to impart well-rounded knowledge in a most understandable way. Without a fundamental cognitive framework for decoding the world, teachers' guide is crucial for children to address the overwhelming burst in the information.
However, a standard learning system prepared for the majority cannot suit everyone. When children built more self-learning skills, some of them may prefer to have customized learning plans. They tend to deviate from the traditional syllabus and look for more advanced resources, which is quite common in the field of engineering and business where knowledge in school tends to fall behind the industry. Bill Gates, for example, accumulated extraordinary computer skills in the labs of Computer Center Corporation.
Besides, a long-standing problem, educational resource scarcity, which is not unusual in developing countries, is pushing students to search for alternative solutions on the Internet. The learning experience at school in the countryside can be considerably worse than those in the metropolis. By learning online courses, students could keep catch with the best class in the world. In China, more than 100,000 students have learned a highly rated cutting-edge course named Machine Learning provided by Stanford University. Those resources are unattainable at school.
In conclusion, while some students learn by following the teachers' guide, others may need to search on the Internet for proper educational resources. It all depended on their circumstances. It is true that students are facing growingly burdened learning assignments. I believe that as long as the workload is kept in the appropriate range, it would bring them an advantage in the future.
Work hard from an early stage could facilitate knowledge accumulation that will be needed after school. To survive the highly competitive adult life, man needs a comprehensive skill set, which is attainable by training heavily and on purposely at an early age. In addition to the academic lessons in the standard class, business practice, team sports, and community volunteering activities could not only broaden children's horizons but also build their management skills and team spirit.
Another essential character that could be cultivated in the early years is the quality of being adamant, devoted, and determined. Onerous tasks under pressure are also useful for developing stress tolerance, and self-discipline. For example, Hedge Funds on Wall Street inclined to recruit young talents with multiple backgrounds in science, business, or sports. Because they believe students who have accomplished more during the same school time are better prepared to survive in the brutal competition in the financial industry.
However, the workload should be kept in reasonable limits because training for the future at the cost of a happy childhood is unworthy. Given that once after school, students will start to take responsibility for their life, youth could be a rare chance they can enjoy life without stresses and strains in their daily lives. They should not be deprived of the carefree and peaceful stage of life.
In conclusion, adapt early to live with pressure is beneficial for children to gain an advantage in the future, but it is crucial to keep the stress under control.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 25, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rounds in science, business, or sports. Because they believe students who have accompli...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 41.998997996 190% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3322.0 1615.20841683 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 595.0 315.596192385 189% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58319327731 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93888872473 4.20363070211 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00272879214 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 321.0 176.041082164 182% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539495798319 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 999.0 506.74238477 197% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 16.0721442886 187% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4638928773 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.733333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192815155666 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499912477982 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414242961054 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836184624462 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503827320124 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 169.0 78.4519038076 215% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.