Central and local government make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue Some people think this money should be invested in social programs for the poor

Essay topics:

Central and local government make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue. Some people think this money should be invested in social programs for the poor.

Nowadays, we live in an age of modern society. As a result, central and local authority tries to promote festival so as to increase revenue. However, some people believe that it is necessary to invest money in social programs for the poor. I agree that money used for social program needs to be prioritized.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that investing festival will bring a great deal of advantages. The revenue which comes from promoting festivals may become the crucial elements to deal with financial disorder. Moreover, it should be highlighted that improving tourists can lead to enhancing reputations in the local area. If the local union makes a frantic attempt to promote festivals, local cities will become one of the best destinations for tourists.
However, I believe that there are a number of advantages to investing money in social programs instead of festivals. First of all, the demand of the poor is more pressing than others. Some researchers point out that the number of unemployment is increasing annual yearly. Moreover, unemployed people have a tendency to become poorer. Because the rate of jobless people will have a lot of negative effects on society, state need to backup them.
Another point is that promoting social programs play a vital role in decreasing social issues. A reason for that is that if central and local government subsidize the amount of the budget which are provided for medicine and charity, the life quality of citizen will be improved. As a consequence, people do not have worry about their life and the number of crimes will be decreased.
To sum up, although promoting festivals have a lot of positive influences on creating revenue. Central and local state should focus on investing in social programs for the poor.
7.5

Votes
Average: 4.3 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, for example, as a result, in spite of, to sum up, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91803278689 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87606820883 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549180327869 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.049575626 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3076923077 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200635637449 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671943838481 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545930241869 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113030937427 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428709764486 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.