The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, instead of using face-to-face interaction, some people in society are using social media to communicate. While many people believe that the use of social media has a great deal of positive impact on daily life, I agree that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that online communication contribute to improve human’s interaction. Firstly, thanks to social networks, people can keep in contact with their families who live in other countries. For example, students who are studying abroad can keep in touch with our loved ones. Moreover, online meetings benefits from social media. Because of a lot of powerful tools, online communication make international congress much easier than traditional meetings.
On the other hand, I personally believe that social media do more harm than good on daily basis. First of all, online conversations reduce the quality of interaction which use verbal languages. Because users have a habit of using abbreviated words on social networks, they are not able to communicate by formal sentences. Besides, social media has some negative impact on children. Due to the overuse of online communication, young people may be under adult’s impression. In addition, a lot of children are addicted to online interaction on social networks.
In conclusion, the use of social media may have a great deal of negative impact on the daily basics although it has some advantages to human’s interaction
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s some advantages to human’s interaction
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39484978541 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99585572149 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56652360515 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.088983678 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6428571429 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313793676819 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10281547358 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103929918881 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207363981604 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140127415921 0.056905535591 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.