Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, we live in an age of technology. While some people claim that digital devices has a great deal of positive impact on children, I agree that children can get much benefits from reading stories than watching TV or playing computer games.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that children are able to absorb a lot of information when they are playing video games or watching TV. To start with, almost contents in video games or TV’s shows are designed based on real life. As a result, children can learn how to tackle with difficulty before facing with it on the basic life. Furthermore, since all color images on the screen are moving, young children may pay attention to the flow of content better than books. Thanks to that, children have the ability to absorb lessons quickly.
On the other hand, I personally believe that gluing eyes on the screen do more harm than good. Firstly, young people can have a lot of bad habits when they are addicted to video games. Today, almost cyber company are trying to create violent actions to attract users. As a result, it is dangerous that children are able to learn bad behavior due to the overuse of using digital devices.
Another point is that reading stories from books help young generation enhance the creation and imagination. For example, thanks to folk stories, young people can get into imagining about princes and princess or take on building a lot of dreams about career in the future.
In conclusion, despite a lot of advantages for children, I claim that reading stories is better than playing e-games on the computer or watching TV has some positive influences on children
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...children, I agree that children can get much benefits from reading stories than watc...
^^^^
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat children are able to absorb a lot of information when they are playing video ...
^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at reading stories from books help young generation enhance the creation and imag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79929577465 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43159489622 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542253521127 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5520448687 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375572184988 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109270595185 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126456880438 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221570032828 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131362888244 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.