Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well‐educated today.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is predictable for children these days to mostly spend their whole day watching television besides gadget. Having children in this era in which full of advance improved technology can lead to this problem. I completely agree that some children are less well educated today, some significance difference are well seen between the present and past children.
Firstly, as children spending their whole day watching television, they grow up learning and picking up some behaviour that seen on television. If the children are teenager, they tend to copy something or someone from the TV or joining the hype that they might not know if it will be a loss or not to them. Therefore, those behaviour lead them to become more free spirited and less respectful to others.
On the other hand, while television cannot replace the book, television might teach children something that are valueable and have wider range than learning from a book if they are under parent guidance and watching a suitable TV channel.
Nevertheless, children should have a limit when it comes to television, not all things that comes from it are good, that is why children should always be supervised and being taught more from a book as book also contains a lot valueable knowledge. Besides that, limiting screen time and spending more with family can be a way for children to be well mannered as they copied what they see from their parents, and that being said also can make children well educated too.
In conclusion, no matter how far television being developed into more advance version, television will never replace book as a learning tool in aspects of knowledge and behaviour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this behaviour' or 'those behaviours'?
Suggestion: this behaviour; those behaviours
...ll be a loss or not to them. Therefore, those behaviour lead them to become more free spirited ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59570698198 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546762589928 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.398127308 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344527344469 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133308041294 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644988176696 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191866700122 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069635774841 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.