It is thought by some people that the best way to find a decent job is graduation from the university. However, other people including me believe that expanding work experiences and acquiring practical skills is the most primary factor in order to be employed.
University is believed to be an optimal environment to teach the necessary knowledge and skills to students since the best professionals in each and every major have gathered together there. In other words, professors and other professional staff in every university are ready to transfer their knowledge to those who are keen to learn. Furthermore, there are some basic and theoretical subjects which are needed for some jobs and they can be taught in university through proper and scientific methods. For example, a mechanical engineer should have enough knowledge of mathematics, physics and other basic sciences in order to be productive in his workplace which this occurs through academic education.
However, some people assume that every job requires the people who have acquired practical experiences instead of those who have merely memorized theoretical subjects which they might have learned in university. One reason for their belief is that university period is not long enough and students are occupied with impractical lessons. As a result, students do not have opportunity to gain skills which are essential in their real workplace. It means academic education might not automatically lead to find a good job after graduation. Additionally, a number of tasks in some factories or other workplaces are implemented by means of expert workers which may do not have received any academic education. For instance, my uncle is a successful electronic technician who is totally expert in his job without going to university.
In conclusion, although academic education might assist people to find jobs in future, I would say it is not enough for most jobs and also it is necessary to teach manual and practical skills during university period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...cation might assist people to find jobs in future, I would say it is not enough for most ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27329192547 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90005580563 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509316770186 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9993505505 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.615384615 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223398477535 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863789470184 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481517448539 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1561372127 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507435118073 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.