Computers are increasingly used in education. In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important?
We are living in a technological era which computers are designed to help people reduce their workload. however, the increasing use of computers in schools should be put into consideration since there are just some subjects that need the role of computers. Teachers are still considered primary positions in teaching.
On the one hand, computers assist greatly in primary level. Subjects designed for computers just consist of the theory and practice questions; therefore, they are extremely suitable for primary children to study learn-by-heart lessons. For example, children can study a foreign language by computers by learning the theory first, then answering the questions to reinforce their knowledge. As a result, accumulating the above-mentioned information by computers is far more convenient and efficient.
On the other hand, further education requires the participation of teachers. Higher classes include discussions, debates, critical thinking and experiments as well. As a result, teachers are the most suitable ones who can be in charged of observing, guiding and giving feedback to students. Computers are just machines, so they cannot point students’ mistakes out as well as giving advice. Additionally, in specific areas like scientific research, only professors can guide their students step by step to conduct a survey or carry research. Therefore, teachers play a primary role in educating students in most areas.
From the above-mentioned, computers contribute largely to the education process of students in their early ages; however, in order to attain professional knowledge and skills, only teachers have the ability to help their students. schools should make use of computers wisely to gain benefits in both teaching and studying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-21 | maatxym | 89 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 77
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age group in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 67
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...d to help people reduce their workload. however, the increasing use of computers in sch...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Schools
...ave the ability to help their students. schools should make use of computers wisely to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66917293233 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1133993794 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59022556391 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0113995537 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.533333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208753346265 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624720985143 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380483413417 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118551608545 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338739227862 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.