In the era of aggressive materialism, consumer durables becomes the significant part of everyone's life. This essay intends to discuss both pros and cons of this phenomenon in the subsequent paragraphs.
On the brighter side, there are certain reasons which are responsible for enhancing the demand of consumer items. To begin with, consumer goods are the status symbol of high class society which brings respect in the society. Therefore, majority of individuals are ready to shell out heaps of money on these goods to earn name and fame in the community. Moreover, every human wants to lead a luxurious or sedentary lifestyle which is possible only to buy these products. So, in this way, individuals can adopt a relish comforts. Furthermore, commodities are always encourage the people to burn in a midnight oil for getting these goods.
On the darker side, in this world, nothing comes for free and the extravagant cost of such goods is the main reason to buy these items. Such kind of products are not attract the yougsters but also put more pressure on their parents to provide such luxury goods. As a result, the debts are increased which puts detrimental impact upon their life. Secondly, individuals has become materialistic and they consume more goods but these durables proves insatiable in spending a great amount of money on it. Even in the shortage of money, humans further pave a way towards anti social activities.
Thirdly, with the increasing techno era,mostly children and individuals are like to live alone and using different gadgets. It is not only deprived off of pleasure of family and society as find pleasures in the family. For instance, the popularity of mobile phones are easily raise because of its unique features and used by youngsters instead of involving any social activity. In addition, consumer goods are reducing the communication skills among adults by prefer such items.
To sum up, having discussed both merits and demerits. This development, undoubtedly, has more drawbacks than benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
...ts. Furthermore, commodities are always encourage the people to burn in a midnight oil fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'attracted'.
Suggestion: attracted
...se items. Such kind of products are not attract the yougsters but also put more pressur...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...come materialistic and they consume more goods but these durables proves insatiab...
^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , mostly
... Thirdly, with the increasing techno era,mostly children and individuals are like to l...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, with the increasing techno era,mostly children and individuals are like to liv...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'raised'.
Suggestion: raised
... popularity of mobile phones are easily raise because of its unique features and used...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, for instance, in addition, kind of, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16918429003 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74228726899 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61329305136 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4083792406 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0526315789 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42105263158 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120926778259 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338492411427 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379661681635 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061245355738 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013047117006 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.