In contemporary society, everyone should have equal opportunities in education. Therefore, universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The issue of access to the education of similar quality for everyone has always aroused heated debated. Due to widely held perception, the same number of men and woman should be allowed to attend all the disciplines while studying in the University. I personally believe that although women’ role in the society was not related to the career previously and consequently their educational development at the similar level with men was not prioritized, today the situation has changed.
On the one hand, some women are discouraged to practice some professions due to their gender identity and subsequently to study certain disciplines. Such professions include a work in police, politics, security forces or science, despite the fact that the history comprises many examples women-professionals in these spheres. Moreover, a significant number of barriers are being created for female applicants in the admission procedure for the specific faculties and the priority is generally given to men candidates. Enrolment trends at the University of Gayana, where two girls even had to sue with the admissions committee over the unfair results of the preliminary test, are a clear indication the patterns triggered by the gender prejudices. Thus, as men are considered more effective in performing definite professional obligations, the access to the specific job trainings is not available for women to the same extent.
On the other hand, the special attention is paid to the struggle against gender discrimination in education as it is the most striking manifestation of the general gender inequality, strongly combated nowadays. Therefore, UNESCO promotes gender equality through and within the educational system, encouraging the solution of problems at all the levels. Most commonly, it develops programs, increasing girls’ and women’ availability to studying all the subjects in formal and informal forms through information and communication technologies. For instance, according to the research implemented by Harvard University, 89% of the educational facilities in 2021 have established innovative approaches in order girls could sign for various disciplines. Hence, female students acquire just as much knowledge as male ones because of the measures aimed at eradication of disparity in learning processes.
In conclusion, I would like to stress that in present day realities despite the hurdles connected with the believes in men’ stronger competency in some fields, the tendency of women’ encouragement to gain education in the preferred area, enhances. To date, all effort to reduce the gender gap in the education is being undertaken so as to provide all the conditions for the female part of the society to study at their full potential as men.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'admissions'' or 'admission's'?
Suggestion: admissions'; admission's
...here two girls even had to sue with the admissions committee over the unfair results of th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
... despite the hurdles connected with the believes in men’ stronger competency in some fie...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ap in the education is being undertaken so as to provide all the conditions for the fema...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2349.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52705882353 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14744912368 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583529411765 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2003401346 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.6 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120641384982 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380242909835 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252907681031 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706489928833 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267891017966 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 78.4519038076 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.