Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation?To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

Essay topics:

Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation?
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

It is predicted that convenience food will inevitably rise in popularity and ultimately take over the current role hold by conventional foods and traditional cooking methods. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with this proposition.

On one hand, there are sound reasons why the signature delicacies of the modern hectic lifestyle are such a tempting option for meals. Firstly, being molded after carefully calculated formulae of meticulously calculated ingredients in in factories’ production lines, these foods can be produced on a much larger scale than their traditional counterparts. The advantages in quantity and availability construct the platform on which industrial products such as instant noodles and canned food become familiar to consumers’ daily meals. Secondly, it is undeniable that the overall appeal of these foods, which include both their visual presentations and flavors, has been significantly heightened as the result of investments worth millions of dollars from the brands producing them. For example, the current sophisticated prepared microwavable ready-meals are now some of the constantly sold-out food items from the supermarket food shelves.

On the other hand, I believe the fact that TV cookery programs are dominating primetime and cook books are topping publishers’ best-selling lists proves otherwise. To begin with, traditional foods and their specific preparation methods are of great cultural significance, serving as the markers of important national holidays. For instance, even until now, in Vietnam, people still celebrate Lunar New Year with feasts of Chung cakes, boiled chicken and steamed red rice. In addition, there have been countless reports on all the hazardous effects of preservatives, flavoring and coloring additives that are frequently used for convenience foods to our well-beings. On the contrary, traditional dishes, which tend rely more on fresh ingredients, authentic spices and culinary skills, can both satisfy diners’ cravings and improve their health with loads of vitamins and heft amounts of nutrients.

In conclusion, while I acknowledge the remarkable growth in popularity of convenience food, I argue that traditional cooking methods and the cultural delicacies are irreplaceable.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
... of meticulously calculated ingredients in in factories' production lines, these...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 874, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...epared microwavable ready-meals are now some of the constantly sold-out food items from the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cultural delicacies are irreplaceable.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85285285285 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21925563603 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657657657658 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2026977466 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.923076923 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.7692307692 7.06120827912 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307979506148 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105426669262 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868324820422 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209377473566 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716895797058 0.056905535591 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.