In recent years, travelling by plane has been very popular, mainly because of the cheaper airtickets in comparison with the past. Although this is beneficial from an economic perspective, it has also brought about a lot of problems concerning the environment. This essay examines the merits and downsides of this issue.
Roaming around the countries by airplane has a positive impact on them, by improving their economy. Indeed, it is true that the financial sector of a plethora of countries is based on tourism. When tourists have the chance to travel in much more countries, as a result of the low cost flights, the financial backgroung of the visiting countries is developped. Greece, for instance, as one of the countries with tourism-based economy, has been benefited by the recently low prices of some airticket companies, since they have increased its GDP. If prices of flying tickets arised, the number of people who like visiting foreign countries would be decreased, and the economy of countries which rely on tourism would plummet.
Even though a drop in flight tickets may bring benefits for coutnries' economies, it can affect negatively the environment at the same time. The operation of airplanes extracts a sheer amount of greenhouse gases at the atmosphere, provoking air pollution, and inimical effects on the environment. Emissions from domestic aviation in US, for example, has increased since 1990, to account for the double greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. Obviously, aircrafts can pollute the environment more than any other mean of transportation, making travelling by plane less-enviornmentally friendly spare time.
In conclusion, although the lower prices in air tickets has resulted in some benefits for the tourism-based economies, it increases the individual's carbon footprint, making airtravelling the main contributor to air pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48805460751 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15494629484 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597269624573 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9237120629 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.692307692 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905959294238 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357248804461 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531350520455 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0532004274874 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517909344837 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.