Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Most of the regions, all over the world are going to be same because of similar products people can consume from everywhere. However, in my opinion, whether it is positive on negative Progress depends on many factors.
On the one hand, many people consider that getting same products are making the world into a small family. Therefore, it is much more convenient for people. For example, people are able to buy Some necessary things such as medicine from own country. As a result, they do not have to go abroad. Hence, they can save not only travelling cost but also the precious time. In short, because of the convenience, people consider the fact as a positive development.
On the other hand, some people argue that being similarity is the main reason for residence forgetting their own culture as well as their own tradition. Since the availability of products makes the countries extremely alike, people buy foreign products rather than local. And so, the local things like milk, sweets and rice are going to remain not sell. In addition, when people are getting same products from anywhere in the world, it is causing a huge loss of remittance for a country. Because, exporting is no more needed. For example, a short survey from University of Dhaka has shown that the income from exporting products has decreased 30% in last five years. Most people often claim that these factors covince them to consider this as a negative development.
In conclusion, although some people think that
is negative progress, I, however, think that the consequence of being similar ought to be considened as a positive development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... huge loss of remittance for a country. Because, exporting is no more needed. For examp...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in short, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97802197802 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60777563596 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553113553114 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0069381002 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9375 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340542014562 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096630063913 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583760779016 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175733478754 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459512034498 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.