Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measure do you think might be effective?
It is often thought that a rise in the price of petrol is the most effective method of solving the increasing traffic and pollution issues. I completely agree with this statement because of the contribution of petrol in pollution these days.
One the one hand, petrol is an essential component which makes people’s transportation easier. However, it has some huge demerits too. Because of the low price of petrol, people are more likely to travel on their personal vehicles which are mostly responsible for the current environmental deterioration and congestion on road. For instance, If the petrol becomes more costly, people will intend to travel with public transports instead of using their own motorized vehicles. This will result in lower-traffic because the number of vehicles would dramatically reduce. Moreover, the gases which are emitted from the cars would also get lowered as a consequence of the reduced using of personal vehicles. Therefore, an increase in the price of petrol is an effective way to solve these issues.
There are a lot more things to apply in order to ensure the problem being solved. Firstly, routes for heavy vehicles and small vehicles should be divided and a strict government order should be imposed. As a result, the number of vehicles running on a particular road would decrease and the congestion would get reduced correspondingly. Turning to the pollution fact, it can only be sorted out by standing against deforestation. There should be a tree plantation event to take place every month which will force the population to plant trees more and more and as a result, the pollution would start reducing because the trees contribute the most to keep our atmosphere clean and balanced.
To conclude, only a rise in petrol price alone can result in lower traffic and pollution. If these observations are considered and steps are taken properly, there is no doubt that the people can be optimistic of getting a healthier environment along with a reduction of congestion on the roads.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1021021021 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85302986649 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51951951952 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1865819545 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150426652652 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570712382293 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608347094175 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109018457511 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601202423955 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.