Nowadays, by technology revolutionized importing and exporting goods are more convenient than the past years. Therefore, it is accessible for people to purchase for identical things even though they do not live in the same place because of countries’ similarity. In my point of view, its drawback overweighs its advantages.
Firstly, all across the world, tourism has been known as one of the most significant industry, and it is rooted to this fact that discovering new places and getting familiar with different cultures is the humankind’s feature. It is inevitable that tourist is the source of income because of creating many jobs. So if individuals have this opportunity to access everything in their own countries, the tourism industry which is profitable for nearly most of the states will be ruined.
Secondly, it is inevitable that culture is an inalienable part of every society and these differences between people’s clothes and lifestyles make it more prominent. As a result manufacturer regard to their people’s attitude and favors produce different goods which economic might be in danger if individuals can access to the same products every corner of the world. Additionally, this trend causes that countries with less power have influenced by the dominant nations. For example, Indian women wear the especial garment that is called sari so if they can access to the same merchandise that American female can, as times go they become similar and sari or other traditional clothes would have vanished.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the diversity among countries has more benefits than similarity which has affected on cultures and tourism industry and indirectly causes some problems in economic.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38827838828 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0326794647 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622710622711 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1422756759 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.727272727 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199103235656 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065735500819 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366793078805 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112998625975 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344995735197 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.