Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same product anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
There is no doubt that in today’s era of globalisation, consumers are getting the benefit of purchasing identical products from the world arena. While many individuals consider it as a positive development, the negative impact should also be taken into consideration. I do not completely agree with this view and will discuss both positive and negative impacts with relevant examples.
On the one hand, the positive aspect is the easy accessibility of products to consumers. This is because, people can conviniently buy online products, which has made the lives easy and comfortable. For example, in my own experience, I had purchased a unique model of a laptop from Korea by online shopping. As a result, it was convenient for me to acquire the sophisticated software I had always desired to possess. In contrast, when products become easily available anywhere in the globe, its unique existence is perished.
On the other hand, the negative impact is observed on the economy of nations. The reason is, the lowering of prices due to competition among companies, which lead to a decline in profit of that firm. For instance, according to a study published in the UK news channel in 2011, it surveyed the purchase and easy availability of Apple phone throughout the world, which led to a competitive decline in its price. As a consequence, the company suffered a financial loss and took many years to recover from it. However, every country should have access to new technologies for the development and growth. Therefore, I believe that sharing of consumer products among territories can not affect its economy if the government set standard rules.
In conclusion, while it is a positive step for any nation to have an access to similar products of other countries, I also believe that the negative impact on economy and uniqueness of a product should also be taken into consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
... a positive step for any nation to have an access to similar products of other countries,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09615384615 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02297796754 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2451049104 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174650485904 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529736292873 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415057052539 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104557595141 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288914841734 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.