In modern days, one of the controversial changes related to that as nations of the wold sold widespread items, the globalization is reaching to many countries. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from benefit and adverse point of view. I will consider how imported goods affect to gross domestic product and then secondly whatever popular products easy to find is loved by people.
On one side of the argument, there are people who claim that great amount of import items strike to GDP that is an essential force to develop a nation. The primary reason for believing this is that giving the consumption expenditure of civils for services of other nations surely harm for an income of the local product. It is also possible to argue that to solve this situation, the tax that imposed for import goods must be high. However, in my opinion, that method influences by harm. One important illustration of this is "cause of the monopoly of the KFC, many businesses of fast food every year fail" says Jhon Henn, the famous researcher of the economy.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is argued that in fact, many individuals who frequently go to other nations say that such popular products as KFC, smartphone and metro are much useful during travel. Moreover, in the twenty-one century, everyone goes to elsewhere in the world and most people have become a consumer of widespread product. A particularly good example is here is last year, one of my Chinese friends visited me and his desire to eat "Sochiani " which is special and traditional Chinese food. By a single search through the internet on my phone. I got to know the specialized available restaurant for that food in my city.
In conclusion, as we have seen, there are uneasy to discuss. On balance, however, I tend to believe that because globalization had spread out the whole world by methods of technology and daily actions, countries will become a more similar
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ching to many countries. In this essay, i am going to examine this question from ...
^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-one
...usefull during travel. Moreover, in the twenty one century, everyone goes to elsewhere in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...uneasy to discuss. On balance, however, i tend to believe that because globalizat...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77873563218 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62350341738 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577586206897 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1699059969 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149802790371 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040388163577 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549319631266 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092472274829 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448787488911 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.