Folks are able to purchase similar products in spite of the locations in the globe as nations have become more and more homogeneous. In my view, this is unquestionably positive advancements. This essay will discuss firstly the negative impacts of globalisation and secondly, on why globalisation is truly constructive and support my opinion with relevant examples.
On the one hand, people are losing their jobs in developed nations according to the opposition of globalisation. Since the manufacturing work is outsourced to developing countries like India and China, where the costs of manufacturing goods and wages are considerably lower than their countries, many people like accountants, editors and scientists have lost jobs. Secondly, spreads of the fast food chain is another concern. For an instance, Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), which is the fastest and largest growing chain, has entirely replaced the traditional foods especially in the developing nations. As KFC is cheap and instant, people put a top priority on these type of fat and sugar rich diets over conventional diets, people are thus prone to develop obesity and cardiovascular disease untimely.
Having said that, one of the most visible perfect effects of globalisation is the improved quality of the products because of the fierce competition. Take Adidas items that are readily available in all countries nowadays for an instance. When a new brand enters a country, it usually comes in riding on some goodwill, which it has to live up to. At the same time, domestic companies are bound to fight out foreign investors, which enables native companies to raise their standards and improve the satisfaction levels of customers. So it leads to the survival of the fittest state, subjecting ultimately both backers to develop characteristic products. Next, thanks again to globalisation, culture enhancement is another remarkable benefit. Sushi, popular Japanese food, would be a good example. If you travel anywhere in the world, you will find Sushi restaurants effortlessly. Therefore, it is clear that the given Japanese food has suited perfectly in foreign culture, making the world more identical and expanding the economy.
In conclusion, with the consideration of sound goods and fostering culture, presumably, globalisation is a worthwhile development.
Essay evaluation report
this is unquestionably positive advancements.
this is an unquestionably positive advancement.
this has unquestionably positive advancements.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 361 350
No. of Characters: 1920 1500
No. of Different Words: 222 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.359 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.319 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.002 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 140 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.056 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.175 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.27 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.451 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 802, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty and cardiovascular disease untimely. Having said that, one of the most visibl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, in my view, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47922437673 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1071344388 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642659279778 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6073564306 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.888888889 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248735321819 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057510896529 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660950010319 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1165820048 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844059071479 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.