Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement

Nowadays, substitute methods of medication are more popular than the standard treatments. While some individuals believe that complementary therapies are somewhat detrimental to human beings, I firmly disagree with the notion. In this essay, both the viewpoints will be elucidated, and I will illuminate my perspective.
To begin with, there are myriad number of alternative medicines that have always been in trend such Homeopath, acupuncture, massage therapies and ayurvedic. Especially, this form of healing was originated in ancient times and since then it has been used in researches to discover cure for unresolved diseases. However, Homeopathic and ayurvedic medicines are made up of natural ingredients, which are often healthier for human body and thus, causes no side effects. Secondly, treatment cost in traditional methods is less extravagant and way cheaper to afford than conventional therapy. For an instance, a single tablet of chemical compound consisting medicine costs $2000 to cure Cancer, although alternative method needs some positive energy to overcome this sin by routine yoga and ayurvedic med, which almost costs nothing. Thus, natural substances have no danger and easily accessible.
On the contrary side, there are some benefits of using conventional treatment over alternative method. Firstly, real medicines consist of effective drugs which could help ill body to recover faster than alternative medicine. In fact, nowadays, in this fast-moving era, most people prefer to recuperate quickly, without bearing the side effects of strong chemicals in medicines. Secondly, researchers have spent more than centuries to invent drugs for every single illness. However, contemporary medicines are yet not discovered remedies for all the ailments. Therefore, standard methods of medicines proved to be more efficient in the case of emergency.
By way of conclusion, although I believe original method of treatment is more effective, benefits of alternative method cannot be competed. Hence, this form of treatment keeps physical body and internal system healthier without consuming mass quantity of chemicals.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in fact, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74132492114 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9669302182 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618296529968 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7351961509 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.058823529 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167092239785 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528945860016 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319049314363 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1008791884 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208656420274 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.