Cycling is an ideal mode of transport for busy urban centres. Do you agree?
Due to the increasing involvement of traveling, the rate of traffic congestions has definitely been increasing in contemporary society. This might lead to the fact that cycling is believed to be a perfect form of transport for busy urban centres; however, it also is as a matter for debate because biking is unlikely to gain benefits outweighed by its drawbacks. This essay will argue the disadvantages of cycling in the inner cities and will also be demonstrated by focusing on in the terms of environment, cost and communication.
The first argument is about environment impacted on by kinds of vehicles. In fact, doing cycle for transport on a daily basis is thought to be more eco-friendly compared to cars. Nonetheless, green cars still make a significant contribution to environmental preservation being like cycling. Specifically, whilst normal cars plays a negative part in air pollution because of emitting a huge amount of fuel exhaust into the atmosphere, alternative energy cars utilize natural powers such as wind, solar water which are not exhausted and are environmentally friendly. For instance, it is suggested that amount of carbon emissions from transport could be reduced by application of alternative energy cars such as electric cars being called to as “gridable vehicles” to replace traditional one for reducing emission from transportation.
Secondly, the cost is also a bone of contention. Despite the fact that the cost of purchasing a bike is lower than other vehicles, it is not included insurances in owning a cycle not being the same as having a car. In this case, insurance could cover repair and replacement of driver’s car in their rights for cases including theft, any kinds of damage, especially in traffic accidents. In contrast, there are not any forms of insurance to cover for a bike; in fact, if cyclers meet an accident such as a bicycle stolen, they would be impossible to get a insurance premium which means that cycler might be at a disadvantage compared with drivers. Furthermore, going for a drive is more convenient to communicate with others than cycling owning to the fact that it is simple to take family or friends for traveling together as not same as cycling in which it is not possible for bikers to carry other passengers.
In conclusion, it can be argued that there are several drawbacks of cycling to be an ideal form of transport for busy urban centres. Moreover, these disadvantages relate to aspects including environment, cost and communication. Consequently, individuals could choose a suitable vehicle for traveling such as cycling or driving depending on their needs; however, it seems to see that cycling’s benefit is outweighed by its drawbacks, which means other vehicles being more superior than bicycle could be an ideal form of transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...stolen, they would be impossible to get a insurance premium which means that cycl...
^
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...backs, which means other vehicles being more superior than bicycle could be an ideal form of trans...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 13.1623246493 236% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 459.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18736383442 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17008961281 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516339869281 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.2021740548 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.8125 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6875 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237575264716 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081887739695 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106076841118 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161301181242 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727691985496 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.