Renewable energy should be applied to replace coal in Australia. Discuss this?
Coal is mined in every state of in Australia and it also plays an integral part in Australia’s economy; however, utilizing this power is likely to lead to a disastrous consequence of environmental contamination, which is noticeably a controversial issue in contemporary society. Owning to this, renewable energy should be applied to replace traditional fossil fuels. This essay will discuss the benefits and risks of greater energy variation in Australia. It will also focus on the merits of renewable energy source as well as the significance of the coal industry in this nation.
Firstly, there is no denying that exploiting alternative sources of power makes a substantial contribution to handle environmental problems such as air pollution specifically. In fact, coal is primarily used for the production of electricity by burned its. As a result from this, coal-fired power plants emit a huge amount of noxious exhaust into atmosphere. This may have negative impacts on human health; for instance, individuals living near the power plants can be suffered from lung cancers. In addition, due to Australia’s topography, there are bountifully available types of exploited power reserves in this region such as wind, hydro and solar being not only natural powers but also unlimited sources. Nicholls (2009) emphasizes that Australia continent receives the highest amount of solar radiation compared to other regions because of its most favorable conditions, giving this continent huge benefits and potential for solar energy production.
In contrast, some valid arguments are against greater energy diversification in Australia. It can be seen that Australia’s energy industry relies heavily on black coal in supplying for the residential consuming needs of electric energy and coal exports around the world. In the case of this, black coal might be an outstanding contributing factor in the growth of Australian economy deriving enormous benefits from the energy industry of Australia definitely. According to Sinclair (2013), it is asserted that Australia’s economy could be threatened seriously and approaches should be planned to solve this economical matter if coal is abandoned as well. Furthermore, products utilizing non-renewable energy tend not to have a high quality and popularity; as a consequence, these products could not satisfy consumer’s desires.
In conclusion, greater power diversification in Australia is still a matter for debate about its merits and drawbacks. Specifically, even though it is necessary to concentrate on not only the benefits of renewable energy sources relating to environmental problems, fossil fuel industry also is a key factor influencing Australian economy. Nonetheless, Earth is facing serious environmental issues such as climate change, air pollution because of overproduction of fossil fuel, this means that it should be encourage to use renewable energy sources for alleviating these contaminations as soon as possible in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 507, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
...ssil fuel, this means that it should be encourage to use renewable energy sources for all...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 517, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
... this means that it should be encourage to use renewable energy sources for alleviatin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2566.0 1615.20841683 159% => OK
No of words: 453.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66445916115 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30534718896 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 506.74238477 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.379493131 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.555555556 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47240045593 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150652026403 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112970213145 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30125736906 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142317474812 0.056905535591 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.