With the development of online communication, people will never be alone and will always be able to make new friends. To what extent do you agree?
It is true that in the era of the Internet human beings can build their relationships via online communication. Although there are good arguments both for and against this view, I believe it depends on different reasons.
I completely concur with the idea that it is easy to expand their social circle given the development of online communication. Firstly, online communication helps people build up their own profiles on the Internet as there are various social networks such as Facebook or Twitter. This would bring their information to other people in the same major. Secondly, by entering the information of what schools they attended in the past, social media might connect them to their old friends who did not keep in touch with them for a long time. If social networks had not been invented, people would not have had any opportunities to find their old friends, even ones in their childhood.
However, I believe that people are prone to feel lonely with the development of social media. The first prominent justification is that the more people depend on social media, the less they pay attention to their real-life families. Furthermore, the millennial generation now inclines to focus on polishing up their profiles with a range of their seemingly happy pictures. These pictures, in fact, do not often reveal people’s real lives. Last but not least, some social media causes children to be addicted to these applications. For instance, there is even an application called Facebook rehab to help the users get Facebook addiction under control.
In conclusion, while reasons can be given to justify that online communication could help people to expand our circle of friends, I believe this is not an accurate statement under any circumstances.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16319444444 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84683051167 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.111319028 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156788092209 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599413533747 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433254968454 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101537952842 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0094298729272 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.