Technical gadgets are a blessing from science to human beings. Some opine that to protect the environment, every person should adopt simple lifestyle, whereas, others argue that these issues can be solved with the help of technology. In my opinion, science is able to eliminate the environmental problems. In the following essay I intend to discuss both the views.
According to some denizens, humans among the whole world should start living a life without all the technical euipmemts, as they are causing great harm to the ecosystem. They think that, if nobody will use luxurious things such as, automobiles, air conditioners and refrigerator then automatically there will be no pollution in the surroundings. Moreover, use of fossil fuels would be reduced to a greater extent when everyone will continue to spend their life with no by-products of fossil fuels. For instance, if mankind would stop travelling by locomotives then consumption of petrol and diesel will decrease.
Paradoxically, others believe that technology is sufficient to act as a safeguard to environment. The problems occurred by the scientific technologies could be curbed by technology. They opine that it is almost impossible to start a life again without any modern technology,as it is difficult to get back from the age of jet engine to the time period of bullock cart. Scientists all over the planet are doing researches to help the environment. For example, in Africa desalination plants have been set up to get clean drinking water from sea water-an almost inexhaustible resource. Furthermore, Japan is working to build a solar space solar power system by 2030.
To conclude, it is irrefutable that technology alone could solve the environmental problems. Even though, the technical devices are harmful, their affects can be mitigated with the help of modern technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...life again without any modern technology,as it is difficult to get back from the ag...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32203389831 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03864603423 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616949152542 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4219411832 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194975508319 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643850183157 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698821377431 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11940666387 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567814293599 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.