Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities
Nowadays by emerging of technology, our life will be changed very swiftly. The youths' interests have been altered such as allocating a specific time to their communities. The controversial question which is often raised regarding is whether young people tend to spend their time for helping their communities. From my own vantage perspective, I am strongly agreed with this idea that young people do not assign time to aid their communities and I will explicate my chief reasons through the following paragraphs.
To commence, the first subtle point requires to be mentioned is that young people are so busy and have to deal with tremendous issues in their life. Therefore, neither they can contemplate about their communities' issues, nor give adequate time to helping them. From my experience, I work in a big company about 9 hours in weekdays. Coincidently, I am studying at a university, so in the weekends I have planned to do my projects and assignments. With these subjects how can I allocate my time to communities? Hence, in our competitive environment youths could not think about communities.
Another compelling reason comes into consideration is other attractive activities which young people prefer to participate. In order to shed more light on the proposed fact various social networks like Viber, Instogram, Facebook, and etc. which are promulgated among juvenile account for wasting their time. Young people claim their time is limited to contribute to their communities. Whereas, they spend several time on other bootless entertainment.
The last but not the least reason why I comply with this subject is that young people are not interested with these sorts of actions. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recently conducted social research, demonstrate more than 70 percent of juveniles believe helping to communities is not profitable or efficient. They neither are satisfied nor feel pleasure after supporting their communities.
To wrap it up, attending to our communities' issues and attempting to obviate them is an untenable social activity. Although, young people do not care about them due to their busy time, other appealing activities and having bootless results from the youths' view. I firmly recommend that government, hand in hand with, families organize some plans to show the significance of communities in our society to young people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'interest'.
Suggestion: interest
...ill be changed very swiftly. The youths interests have been altered such as allocating a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...tworks like Viber, Instogram, Facebook, and etc. which are promulgated among juvenile ac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ted to contribute to their communities. Whereas, they spend several time on other bootl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36939313984 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01916841553 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572559366755 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.738305761 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9047619048 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0476190476 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09523809524 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36206559388 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968825435953 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076576723816 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201681339264 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655554429879 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.