Do you agree or disagree living with animals, such as owing a pet, cat or bird, is good for people? Use personal examples to illustrate your response.
Human beings have shared the world with animals since the down of time. Throughout history, animals have provided humanity not only with sustenance and work, but also with companionship. It is agreed that living with animals is very beneficial for people. This argument will be proven by looking at how sharing a home with animals can both encourage feeling of empathy and teach responsibility.
For one, common dwelling with animal and human can help people understand the feeling and needs of others. For instance, when I was a child, I was requiring our families two dogs. Caring these two dogs demanded I to be conscious of their needs, and it improved feelings of empathy. As this show, living with animals has a positive effect on people. In addition to this, people who share their home with animals are thought how to be responsible. Returning to prior example from my youth as a young boy, I had to follow an accurate schedule to ensure or taken outside a few times a day. This daily routine responsibility for other things living had a very strong impact on my sense of duty. It is obvious from this that owing a pet in home has a great benefit to people.
Following this looking at how living with animals increases a sense of empathy and responsibility. It has been proven that sharing home with on other living things have a lot of advantage and disadvantages. Thus, owing pets at home highly recommended.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owing pets at home highly recommended.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76113360324 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69193933738 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566801619433 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8427724691 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.4 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4666666667 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158995056616 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658658289095 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424904639941 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119392338683 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106500069816 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.