When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life died of. It is pointless to try to and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Preserving nation's customs and habitual skills is essential thing from the down of time. Throughout history, it is very controversial issue that technology has a bad effect on traditional skills, destroying the way of life, but it is agreed that technology not only protects nation's customs and traditional skills, but also it enhances the people way of living. This argument will be proven by looking at how technology has a lucrative impact on nation's traditional skills.
For one, this is obvious from this that, the history of civilization is the history of technology: from the discovery of fire to invention of the wheel to development of the Internet. This makes it clear that people do everything, that in the past they did. However, the way of living has been up to date. Some technologies such as medical science positively help people to live healthy and longer. Moreover, improving the transportation system assists people to have comfortable existence. As this show, it has been changed the way of traditional living.
In addition to this, technology can positively contribute to the keeping alive to conventional skills and way of life. For instance, in Jepan, with developing of technology, people don’t forget their customary customs and skills. Most of the times around the cities they have some rituals to celebrate their traditional customs and introduce them to new generations. Besides, people share these ceremonies in some social networks. This makes it clear that technology helps to teach that country's young people conventional skills and how use them in their lives.
In conclusion, it is obvious from this that we should not ignore technology, and it has been proven that technology has a fabulous impact on country's traditional skills and the way of living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ditional skills and the way of living.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20344827586 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91767543848 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2170914636 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221749243482 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761929037576 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550310214182 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14589048025 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262972690377 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.