Dogs are one of the most popular pets in the world, yet many would say it is inappropriate to have them in built-up inner-city areas?
It has been argued that nurturing dogs in urban areas is unsuitable. Although allowing dogs to live in their natural habitats is beneficial to some extent, it is better to raise dogs in metropolitans areas.
On the one hand, letting dogs live in their wildlife exerts potential significant impacts on both dogs and human beings. Firstly, in their natural environment, dogs follow and develop their instincts - such as a keen sense of smell - to catch prey. This helps them be more physically active and generally healthy compared to domestication ones. In addition, because their ancestor is a wild animal, they sometimes inevitably bring possible hazards to humans, especially young kids. For example, in Vietnam, eating a bite of chocolate, one family dog became unexpectedly crazy and bit a newborn, which causes that infant’s painful death.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why nurturing dogs in inner-city places is more beneficial. The first reason is that there are lots of vulnerable and disabled dogs, which cannot compete with other predators to survive in such an extreme environment. This makes sustainable human feeding and affection become irreplaceable sources of their livings. Another reason is that having dogs as a pet prevents people, particularly those who live in a fast-paced city, from having mental illnesses such as depression or anxiety disorder. According to reliable research at the University of Cambridge, people owning dogs have lower chances of traumatic stress disorder as dogs bring marvellous joy and boundless energy when playing with them.
In conclusion, despite the advantages of having dogs live outside non-rural areas, it is better to own keep dogs in a city.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8294788236 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6596335855 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17728446467 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617643728551 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427127287282 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107661961613 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020123905998 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.