Being an integral part of life, technology and advanced science has brought about the similarity of lives for people from all walks of life. It is often argued that it is a negative tendency, while I believe that it may well be a positive development for enhancing education and the improving quality of life.
To begin with, a similar lifestyle and, thus, implementing technology around the world may give rise to the enlightenment of those who have not had access to education. This is because people may well get not only information around the world due to the Internet but also the education. This is important for improving the general standard of living due to it appears to open wide job opportunities. For instance, teleworking or outsourcing. Therefore, the similarity of access to knowledge would play a crucial role in education and job opportunities for rural areas or places in the back of beyond.
In addition, there are other factors in favour of having a similar lifestyle that in turn may increase the quality of life. Firstly, consuming the same products would contribute to decreasing the cost of goods which makes a plethora of products more affordable. In other words, whether it be food or clothing would no longer be costly for the not-haves. What is more, this similarity tends to relieve racism and an inadequate attitude towards who looks different. To put it another way, culture fusion and the same dressing style may diminish biased judgement based on appearance and help to adopt different culture with ease.
In conclusion, having embedded in society, science and technology have led to the similarity of lifestyle. Although some people think that it has a harmful influence, I do not agree with this view. I believe, it may help to get education and job for those in the back of beyond and improve their quality of life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91401273885 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79645581375 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547770700637 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5018407454 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.866666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250999831042 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731920659271 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655258012894 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146071589301 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628411836273 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.