Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

It is often argued that proper outfits play a crucial role in the working place, while others disagree and believe that the quality of staff’s performance should be in priority. This essay will examine both points of view and will state that formal clothes are essential in the business world such it projects a good image of companies and creates the professional appearance of employees.
It is clear that formal clothes convey an image of responsibility and trustworthiness of a company. This is because, dark shades of colours in dressing are believed to be a straightforward way to maintain these strengths as intelligence, reliability and conscientiousness. It would mean that clients may seem to think that a person in a dark bluish suite has these qualities, rather than a person in frumpy bright outfits. In addition, having unique companies’ image is vital for creation close-neat team as it fosters solidarity between staff and promotes equality between colleagues. That is to say, it makes them feel part of a team and gives them a sense of belonging to a company.
However, some opponents are of the opinion that employers should prioritize the standard of their staff’s efficiency. No matter what employees are wearing, if they tend to meet deadlines and contribute to the development and flourish of a company. It could be best exemplified by IT specialists who work remotely. Hardly may their smart style outfits positively impact their productivity when their clothes are uncomfortable. Hence, it appears to may deteriorate their efficiency and decrease their confidence. Therefore, some companies with strict dress-code policies encourage casual-style on Fridays.
In conclusion, although people may vary in their opinion about whether should dress wisely or quality of work should be ahead of appearance. Personally, from my point of view, the appropriate dressing can establish valuable characteristics which engage customers and forge a close bond between staff.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37380191693 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14761511908 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61661341853 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4476305442 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.133333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273658695741 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751135141676 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576738066432 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148648838621 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538013561664 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.