It is often said that it is essential to implement tree-planting schemes than newly built housing in vacant places in cities. Personally, I firmly agree that planting new green areas in new urban areas has more positive benefits for public health and the environment.
To begin with, tree planting trees and bushes is beneficial for mental health and physical health. This is because plants have a natural ability to purify and cool the air, which may positively impact mental well-being. In other words, a gulp of fresh air and a serenity strolling between trees can reduce stress levels evoking a feeling of tranquillity amid the hectic pace of life in bustling urban places. Furthermore, green areas tend to improve concentration which in turns about increasing productivity in all walks of life and reducing aggression. Therefore, planting plants would enhance public health and improve the quality of life.
In addition, it can benefit not only public health but also the environment. What I mean by this, trees appear to play a vital role in filtrating the air containing damaging pollutant particles caused by emissions from vehicles and other human activities. To put it another way, a decent number of green areas would be able to mitigate the harmful effect of emissions by refining the air and eventually tackling air contamination. By contrast, the situation can be deteriorated providing that all vacant places would be occupied by newly built buildings. It would mean that life in overcrowded cities can give rise to put a strain on people's life and the environment that an already stretched on a critical point with considerable numbers of cars and factories. It is therefore clear, that planting, rather than building, would help to relieve a strain on the environment.
In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinion whether new housing should be built or a new tree-planting scheme, in my opinion, any green areas highly important for human well-being since they affect public health and the environment. This is entirely different from construction that can only aggregate an already overcrowding cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19130434783 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88134895711 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56231884058 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0157460973 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.4 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168971632053 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526330557168 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477628657671 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114558959008 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643167907474 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.