Economic progress is considered a significant factor to measure a country s success But many people think that other factors should be considered when measuring the success of a country What other factors do you think measure a country s success Among the

Essay topics:

Economic progress is considered a significant factor to measure a country's success. But many people think that other factors should be considered when measuring the success of a country. What other factors do you think measure a country's success? Among these, is one more important than the others?

Nowadays, finance is increasingly becoming a symbol of a nation's advancement. Meanwhile, some argue that other aspects, simultaneously, contribute noticeably to the growth of a country. In my opinion, whereas economics is an efficient measurement, other indicators still act as imperative roles in improving a country status.

Among those units, education is, undeniably, the most influential factor. It is because a rise in labour's intelligence can thoroughly affect to the employment rates and meet the present market's highly professional demanding. Therefore, a country with outstanding quality in the educational system would result in a higher level of development. Furthermore, with an increment in trained employees, the respective nation would then be able to approach various opportunities and achieve a specific amount of reputation, even internationally. Distinguished mathematicians from International Math Olympic, for example, could make up a respectable facade for that nation's development. In other words, education not only helps to illustrate a country's improvement but also helps to predict its growing potential.

Another considerable measure would be the quality of national security. As a country can ensure its safety and peacefulness, its citizens would thus gain various advantages. Without interruptions and disturbances, people could concentrate altogether in improving economic system, education quality, healthcare services and so on. Additionally, international companities are more likely to invest vastly on an amicable nation rather than a chaotic one. This means that these companies can sustainably forage their enterprise thanks to the low crime, discord and political conflict rate. In consequences, people from those particular countries would as well avail.

To conclude, while general financial status is a direct indicator for a country's improvement, many other determinants should be taken into account at the same time.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... is increasingly becoming a symbol of a nations advancement. Meanwhile, some argue that...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...d make up a respectable facade for that nations development. In other words, education ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be taken into account at the same time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01060070671 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41139314159 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6925795053 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7832574668 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177857993871 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518780096566 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452541402662 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105370428845 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146994204702 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.28 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... is increasingly becoming a symbol of a nations advancement. Meanwhile, some argue that...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...d make up a respectable facade for that nations development. In other words, education ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be taken into account at the same time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01060070671 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41139314159 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6925795053 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7832574668 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177857993871 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518780096566 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452541402662 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105370428845 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146994204702 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.28 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.