Traditional medicines, such as herbal remedies and acupuncture, are very popular in some countries. Those who practice traditional medicines claim that it is better than modern medicine in maintaining and improving health. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
In some countries, many people believe that ancient medical treatments are immensely efficient. Thus, they argue that these methods are a more reasonable way to maintain their health, while others think that it is lab medicine that can provide better health improvement. From my perspective, I agree with the latter statement that scientific methods should be prioritised in terms of health maintenance.
On the one hands, there are various advantages generated by traditional treatments. One of those would be the cost-effectiveness given by the essence of these medicines. For examples, by curing trivial diseases, such as flu or fever, from natural resources, people would thus be able to reduce a tremendous amount of fees in comparison with hospital drugs. Moreover, custom cures are significantly more natural-friendly. Meaning that people could elude numerous chemical and side effects if they opt for traditional prescriptions. Besides, these resources are available everywhere and year-round so that families could combine herbals based on reliable recipes, which would reduce financial burdens and save valuable time.
On the other hands, apart from the pros above, it is clear that up-to-date medicines would produce individuals with the best health quality. It is because modern treatments are proved through many scrutinies and academic research; meaning that the impacts and drawbacks of these methods are assured. Consequently, patients would not have the angst of enduring unexpected or side effect in the long run. Furthermore, health-care services are offered by professional doctors and trained nurses that would enhance the usefulness of respective medicines, which would eventually raise patients' health status. Additionally, the effect of scientific drugs are instantaneous that could assist people to recover faster. In other words, these methods are extremely beneficial in order to develop humans' health.
To conclude, whereas manual methods could be advantageous in term of costs and nature friendly, individuals should aim for the most advanced treatments if their objectives are health maintenance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-18 | tanthao123456 | 84 | view |
- Is invention of robots fruitful or dangerous Discuss advantages and disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 89
- In some countries the number of people who visit art galleries is declining What are the reasons for this How can we solve this problem 89
- Some people believe that what children watch on television influences their behaviour Others say that amount of time spent watching television influences their behaviour Discuss both views and give own opinion 89
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir objectives are health maintenance.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, apart from, for example, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74447949527 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03737495021 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618296529968 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8518394272 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134871782136 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407661949005 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392128776926 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785569712882 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04710208308 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.