Businesses should have social responsibilities in the communities where they operate. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many countries, especially developed ones, enterprises have become the most valuable wealth sources. Some argue that these companies should take responsibilities for the environment in which they located, while others believe it is not necessary since they are non-government organisations. From my perspective, I strongly agree with the former statement that corporations, even not mandated, should be accountable for their locals.
First of all, there would be many drawbacks if entrepreneurs ignore communal issues altogether. One of those impacts would be the destruction of the habitats they operating in because of the generated pollution. Heavy-industrial factories, for example, would cause a vast number of death fishes and local animals when they pour contaminated wastes into rivers. Another negative influence is the noticeable decline in a company's reputation. Organizations, as usual, acquire numerous resources from these areas. Consequently, as products are produced but could not contribute to the prosperity and develop of the respective towns, cargo values would thus fall unstoppably. In other words, the more irresponsible the enterprise is, the less it is reputed.
In contracy, if corporations can dedicate themselves into the benefits of the whole society, extraordinary advantages could be obtained. It is because of the rise in the percentage of qualitative employees and customers attracted by the companies' responsibleness. For instance, an industry which always creates profits for its local will eventually receive more buyers in comparison with its counterparts. Moreover, by linking a start-up's needs with communal needs, there would be more opportunities for the company to scale in the future. People tend to believe in one that has already done what they said. Therefore, enterprises with a recorded contribution to its communities would be trusted to provide the same benefits to the next region; meaning that they are more likely to succeed in scaling their empire.
In conclusion, nowadays, as more and more businesses are founded, more responsibilities should be taken into account simultaneously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...mployees and customers attracted by the companies responsibleness. For instance, an indus...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.715625 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32877927841 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.566618766 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.588235294 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122332304122 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347414117667 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419662884415 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817901288904 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399444275123 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.