Establishing good relationships in the workplace is not important, as the primary goal of every person is to focus on work.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is often argued that developing workplace friendships is not important, because the main goal of each person is to concentrate on their careers. I totally disagree with this statement and think that forming friendships with colleagues is more beneficial for human beings than focusing on work.
First of all, I believe that human nature is arranged in such way that after the basic core needs (shelter and food) humanity has the urgent demand in companionship. In other words, real friendship is the key to people's mental health and happiness. However, as the average workweek continues to expand, employees can no longer be fulfilled without befriending their colleagues. Thus, people try to form strong bonds, even long-term friendships with their co-workers. There is a lot of evidence that workplace friendships fulfill the basic human need for companionship. For example, recent research revealed that 70 percent of employees said having friends at work is the most crucial element to a happy working life.
Secondly, I think that maintaining friendships with people at work is not only socially healthy for workers; it is also a great way to learn about areas of the business outside of their team, expertise, and skill. In other words, employees get access to information about a company where they work through informal networks. This helps to create a more comprehensive understanding of what the company is working towards, how other departments operate, and reveal some of the organization's pain points, which in turn allow people more effectively collaborating on common projects. Thus, it is beneficial when friendships have place in the working team not only for employees but for whole organization in general, increasing its productivity and competitiveness.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that to forge friendships in the office is more advantageous for people than to focus on working duties because it makes people happy and the organization to thrive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...w other departments operate, and reveal some of the organizations pain points, which in tur...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, in general, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32484076433 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02547770701 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.053888976 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.615384615 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132198646928 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490555267511 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485671348567 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974252816551 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675988379601 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.