Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that long average working hours positively influence on economic level of countries compared with those which employees have shorter working hours. This essay agrees with that suggestion completely and first will represent direct relationship between lengths of work with contribution into economics and then show that long average working hours provide better services which also impact on economics of countries.
It is clear that economy of any country in particular rely on industrial sectors, agricultural and manufacturing which significantly contribute into it. It is often observed that as long per day these economic sectors work as much goods they can provide. It is therefore positive developments which gain GDP through economic sectors participation. For example, Polish Central Bureau of Statistics revealed major indicators by economic branch in comparison with hours of labor force and stated the fact of strong relationship between working hours and high economic level of country.
The second considerable reason for developed economy of countries is long average working hours which were spent on different services such as transportation and communication, public services, financial, commercial and personal services. Moreover, all these services working longer will overweight investments that were spent on workers salaries and bring bigger financial benefits into economic success of countries than those countries which services work shorter hours. For example, The Times recently demonstrated statistical data of the Britain economy that showed obvious success from contribution of services for general population and business that work longer working days.
In conclusion, all branches of economy should work longer due to contribute more goods, supplies bigger industrial arias and provide better services which as a result, will positively impact on success of countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also impact on economics of countries. It is clear that economy of any country ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... per day these economic sectors work as much goods they can provide. It is therefore...
^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rs work as much goods they can provide. It is therefore positive developments whic...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
...opments which gain GDP through economic sectors participation. For example, Polish Cent...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...business that work longer working days. In conclusion, all branches of economy s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86476868327 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86785051182 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548042704626 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9895604475 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.8 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415053919245 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175344464015 0.084324248473 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10230129384 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26061826497 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117108511749 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.0946893788 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.