Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
For the financial development of a nation, it is a duty of every individual to be engaged in the employment. Some believe that long service hours are directly proportional to the growth of a country. I partially agree with the statement because this practice has not achieved monetary benefits to every country. This essay in the forthcoming paragraphs will provide relevant idea and state the reason of disagreement too along with the supporting example.
It is true that the maximum time devoted at work leads to the maximum productivity of an organisation because a task can be accomplished in less time with more efficiency. This trend as a result aids in fortifying the economy of the motherland.For instance, the natural disaster in japan caused the destruction of roads and skyscrapers, but it rebounded in short span due to the involvement of strong dedicated manpower and time. That is why, a key to have a boosted gross domestic product lies in the amount of work input.
Alternatively, gruelling and extraordinary long shifts are unhealthy for a human’s body and mind. It impedes the normal progress of an employee as it causes the physical and psychological exertion. Needless to say, a human body is incapable of delivering a favourable outcome in an unsound condition. Like India is still a developing country, and haven’t made much improvement even though the workers of several companies do overtime, even after 10 hours stretch. Therefore, the prosperity of a nation doesn’t completely rely on prolonged working hours.
To sum up, for a country to flourish, mankind's efforts are essential, however, it must not exceed beyond the decent working hour as it will obstruct the performance of whole land.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ortifying the economy of the motherland.For instance, the natural disaster in japa...
^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifying the economy of the motherland.For instance, the natural disaster in japan ...
^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n prolonged working hours. To sum up, for a country to flourish, mankinds effo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, therefore, in short, as a result, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14184397163 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07888016056 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631205673759 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9609061707 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.538461538 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186093203388 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521907126542 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453585063551 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991282030189 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241142629956 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.