Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that while employees are experiencing exhausting workweeks, countries are making great steps toward economic success. This essay agrees that some developing countries with long working hours increase their industrial productivity and succeed in economy. This essay will first look at the differences in working hours between developed and developing countries and then discuss how long average working hours boost industrial productivity.
It is clear that people work shorter hours in developed countries than in developing countries. This attributes to the difference in the production technology. Thus the higher the technology level is, the higher the GDP per capita is, and the less there are of workers who supply labour. Hence, if particular developing country wants to overtake another one it need to increase working hours of employees. For instance, the United Nations Development Program released a report about developing countries in Africa that showed long hours Algerians spend working are indication that they contributed in production more than their rival countries in Africa.
Businesses working in manufacturing have some of the highest industry impact rates of economy of a country out of all economic sectors. Long working hours improve manufacturing productivity that is a key aspect of economic growth. Moreover, higher productivity leads to lower unit costs and higher profits. This is therefore positively influence on economic success of countries. For example, recent research revealed that there are two main measures factors of economic success. These are the GDP at the national level and profit at the organizational level.
In conclusion, working hours are longer in less developed countries due to lack of advanced technology. To be economically more successful such countries should increase working hours.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng hours boost industrial productivity. It is clear that people work shorter hou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ifference in the production technology. Thus the higher the technology level is, the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e than their rival countries in Africa. Businesses working in manufacturing have...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and profit at the organizational level. In conclusion, working hours are longer ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountries should increase working hours.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67857142857 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91844066556 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9304841581 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394716907781 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138500780591 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102762073415 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27292559989 0.151304729494 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583499662284 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.