The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages?
In the contemporary society the wide use of social media deprives people of real human interaction. This essay will argue against it because the advantages of modern digital world with variety opportunities for virtual communication via Internet outweigh the disadvantages of a lack of communication in real life.
The human beings by default have been programmed to be socially active and people always have been looking for ways to connect and network with each other. With the proliferation of advanced technology numerous social networking platforms, sites and applications appeared in free access through the Internet. This allowed people to be socially active, interact on social media, make audio/video calls to friends and relatives, post content or just make comments. As a result, people feel themselves as a part of the society, an element which functioned actively on social media and no longer alone. A recent survey, for example, found that many users on social networks admitted that virtual communication helps them to solve mental health issues such as stress from loneliness or even depression.
Although the advantages of social media are obvious, some still feel that Internet removes from people human communication. That is to say, human interaction teaches people valuable skills such as friendliness, discourse, debate, empathy, respect and tact and many believes that virtual communication could not provide this. It is reasonable to notice that social media does not replace face-to-face communication, rather changes its form to virtual, keeping all its advantages. For example, as per the statistics revealed on official Ukrainian site of statistic, approximately 95% of Ukrainian users used social networking platforms and applications in time of lockdown due to COVID-19.
In conclusion, the obvious benefits of virtual interaction on social media such as availability via Internet, variety social networking sites and free access to them clearly overweighs the flawed argument that social media is removing human interaction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-22 | minhlamnguyen1204 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | linh thao | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-23 | nam.phanthanh97 | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-27 | nhibinhbinh | 90 | view |
| 2020-10-26 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
- Countries should spend moneyn on trains rather than new roads Do you agree or disagree 73
- The government should reduce the amount of money spend on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming To what extent do you agree 73
- Establishing good relationships in the workplace is not important as the primary goal of every person is to focus on work To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- Some people believe that capital punishment should not be used Others however argue that it should be allowed for the most serious crimes Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...rammed to be socially active and people always have been looking for ways to connect and network...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess from loneliness or even depression. Although the advantages of social media ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62820512821 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02544409398 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2962435947 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.333333333 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279240584235 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102956831865 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590754474135 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171204520612 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497243547255 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.