It is obvious that population of poor people is increased over the few years. This essay will confront the worries faced by the poor and project possible solutions to solve this problem.
Firstly, the reason for extending count of poor people is due to uprising of war in border across two countries. Both countries are equally armed and they are fighting for their stand. Consequently, after the war, there are people who are
left stranded without their family heads. Miserable,they lose them in war. Hence, they are prone to poverty and, unable to handle finance of family. Secondly, there is an explosion in population in underdeveloped slum areas, so they are not
handle the education or family expenses. Finally, unemployment is major fact to poor, as there is discrimination in finding suitable job for them in Multinational companies. They are also affected by natural disaster and they are unable to
retrieve their properties lost after their recent storm. they also have not received any compensation from government for storm because of their underdeveloped area.
Obviously, there are three possible solutions for these issues. Most importantly, countries can initiate peace talks by negotiating with their counterpart by sharing their farm produce or the products that other country is lacking with.
This would solve the worries of poor people of losing their family member permanently. Additionally, Government can implement strict laws such as "One family One child" making the population rise to be under control. Similarly,
Richer countries such as Japan can expand their company to poor countries and enable employment for poor in Car industry, Two wheeler industry. Furthermore, damage caused by natural disaster such as storm can be addressed by Government claims and it would alleviate them to compensate their loss.
In conclusion, successful negotiations, Government stringent laws on birth control and globalization of countries in underdeveloped areas, Immediate availability of claims after disaster are effective in dealing with issue. If government practices these solutions, Percentage of poor people would soon drop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... after the war, there are people who are left stranded without their family heads...
^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...ed without their family heads. Miserable,they lose them in war. Hence, they are prone...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...derdeveloped slum areas, so they are not handle the education or family expenses....
^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... natural disaster and they are unable to retrieve their properties lost after the...
^^^
Line 6, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...operties lost after their recent storm. they also have not received any compensation...
^^^^
Line 9, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on rise to be under control. Similarly, Richer countries such as Japan can expan...
^^^
Line 10, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stry, Two wheeler industry. Furthermore, damage caused by natural disaster such a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55120481928 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97424927189 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7006310292 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4736842105 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238132098748 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741076593972 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582345782268 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105058230101 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548380325791 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.