Firstly, we should not be compared with wild animals and their survival in the 21st century. Also, earth belongs to all including humans, animals, birds, and reptiles. Hence, there is no proof that exists that wild animal do not help us by any means. Besides, there are reasons for wild animal survival as its created by nature. Moreover, humans are not afraid of wild animals nowadays, and they feel their existence may not serve any purpose to this world. This perception is completely absurd as humans exists in this world, wild animals also have rights to live in forest.
Secondly, wild animals do not live in cities or towns. They exist in natural habitat such as forest. Forest is absolutely essential to avoid global warming. Due to increase in population, we should not destroy forest and it creates danger to natural climate. Each wild animal living in forest depend on other wild animal for their survival. Hence, it creates natural balance for all life in earth.
Finally, we have rights to protect wild animals as they help us by several ways. Tusk of elephant, fur of wild bear are worn by us for day-to-day life. So, in my opinion we should think that they are not useful for us as domestic animals, people should also view their natural purpose for survival in forest.
In conclusion, we should ensure the wild animals exists until humans survive in this world. We need to protect them by saving them from natural disaster such as forest fires or volcanoes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...tural habitat such as forest. Forest is absolutely essential to avoid global warming. Due to increas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ger to natural climate. Each wild animal living in forest depend on other wild an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, as for, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26944669737 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513725490196 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7638334858 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.0 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189101554198 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725167380977 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615987730567 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124201498662 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364693642967 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.