Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that it is meaningless to spend money on wild animal preservation because there is no place for them in this century. From my own perspective, this view is completely absurd, and I disagree with this view.
To begin with, some wild animal species have been living on the earth for thousands of years, some species even exist before human’s appearance. Human is not the master of the earth, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist. All the animals made up for the biological chain. It is widely acknowledged that the extinction of one species may cause the imbalance of the entire biological chain. For example, if lions and tigers extinct from the prairie, the number of herbivores will surge, which would lead to the degeneration of the prairie, next, these herbivores will extinct eventually because the lack of sufficient food resource. This example proves to us the importance of keeping species diversity.
In addition, human beings usually provide natural habitats in order to protect wild animals, these natural habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, forests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide, besides, forests can help regulating climate. If we destroy these areas, there will be further deterioration of the ecological environment, thus we may face more severe environmental problems.
In conclusion, it is necessary to protect wild animals, it is not only for wild animals, but also for the benefits of human. I believe we should do everything we can to protect them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...f the earth, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist. All the anim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to regulate' or 'regulate'.
Suggestion: to regulate; regulate
...rbon dioxide, besides, forests can help regulating climate. If we destroy these areas, the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16535433071 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74716273522 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586614173228 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4284380242 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.923076923 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156034382366 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586932207934 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643047203245 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103511535952 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505787154503 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.