By developing countries, the fact of wild animal extinction are revealing nowadays and some people believe governments should not waste their resources for supporting this kind of creatures while some people have completely diverse opinion, although my idea is coincided with the latter group. In this essay I will evaluate, whether our try to prevent extinction of wild animal in 21st century is true or not.
Firstly, it needs to be mention that we are not the only creatures on the earth and cause of all this kind of trouble (namely, global warming, pollution, deforestation, soil erosion, etc) is human kind. So it is unfair to let the circumstances go to destroy the life of another creature on the ground which have right to growing, reproducing, totally, right to live, as same as human being. Wild animal have been gotten an integral part of earth environment and the governments, particularly developed, have to dedicate all kind of resources to recover these kinds of detrimental effects on the wild animal habitat.
On the other hand, if you consider another aspect of this issue you will find out that wild animals are the most prominent attraction for vast majority of environmental friendly individuals. The survey illustrates documentaries related to wildlife has been among the highest fancy program in the TV and social media. Therefore it is reasonable reason to care about wild animal and assign appropriate budget to this kind of activity.
In a nutshell, regarding all above mentioned, it is an obvious truth that protecting or supporting activities for wild animal for the time being is not wasting money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ncy program in the TV and social media. Therefore it is reasonable reason to care about w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08955223881 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85144947176 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619402985075 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6933087744 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.555555556 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7777777778 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180056903603 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718285802694 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453345537694 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107432603723 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00691073712813 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.