Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
According to International Cultural Centre (ICC), there are more than 5,000 has established in the world. 500 of them are endangered. In the context of Indonesia, there are 50 local languages which still using by society. The Ministry of Education and Culture Republic of Indonesia have been concerning to keep all of local languages as a part of Indonesian cultural heritage.
I would like to disagree towards the omission of die out a language. Even though the purpose of the die out language numbers should give an effectiveness to communicate with others, albeit it have negative impacts towards state resiliency.
There are three reasons for strengthening my preference. Firstly, language is the identity of a nation. All of countries was functioned language not only for sources of communication, but also for keeping the national integrity and social cohesion among society. Secondly, language is a basic knowledge which used for knowing the characteristic of society. Thirdly, language is a source of national sovereignty.
Based on these reasons, some of countries have been conducting to involving local language lessons in every educational curriculum levels. Moreover, in Malaysia all of provinces were intervened by the state to promote local language not only in school, but also in various government events. In the context of Japan, for keeping their identity, the government has regulated that all of anime characters should involved a part of their cultures and languages.
In my conclusion, there are many positive way for maintaining language which endangered then tolerate to die out a language which threatened the identity of a nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... and Culture Republic of Indonesia have been concerning to keep all of local languages as a par...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...language. Even though the purpose of the die out language numbers should give an ...
^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...s to communicate with others, albeit it have negative impacts towards state resilien...
^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the countries') or simply say ''some countries''.
Suggestion: some of the countries; some countries
...sovereignty. Based on these reasons, some of countries have been conducting to involving local...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'tolerate dieing', 'tolerate dying'.
Suggestion: tolerate dieing; tolerate dying
...ntaining language which endangered then tolerate to die out a language which threatened the ide...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40229885057 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03996370214 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567049808429 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2888989079 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164766949805 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598032097892 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403061723697 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977319263234 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028372017745 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.