Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is believed that several languages are extinct because of unimportant and easier if there are fewer common languages. However, I completely disagree with this opinion.
It is important to recognize that the existence of language has a significant meaning. One reason for this is that it is built up by the mind of the ancestors for a long-term. For instance, nowadays, Vietnamese is not a very uncommon language. To make up every single word, the Vietnamese ancestors had to go through of hieroglyphs, alphabet, and accent to separate Vietnamese from its old traditional language, Chinese. It is understandable that those who making a language are really intelligent. Hence, we should appreciate their contributions instead of destroy it.
One cannot deny that language represents the culture of a country. This is a way of communicating between people of a specific group or a country. Another example is that people who live in the Amazon forest. They have their own languages and there is no right to eliminate it. Although it is spoken by just a small group of people, those people might not be able to use any other languages for communication. Therefore, it is better to keep all the languages because it might be important to some small number of people in the world.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that replacing unimportant languages is not a good idea because there might be a number of people who truly need it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ilt up by the mind of the ancestors for a long-term. For instance, nowadays, Vietnamese is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97095435685 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99896391147 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55601659751 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8680297139 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8666666667 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0666666667 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292469474298 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948797593102 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747326351012 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189089719718 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093943012702 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.