The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the information of number of trips that children at the age of 5 to 12 in a country in 1990 and 2010 travel to and from school as a car passenger, walker, cycler, bus taker or taking bus and walking.

Overall, the majority of children in 1990 and in 2010 went to or from school by being a car passenger or walking. Even though the number of trips as a car passenger increase significantly, there is an obvious decrease for all other modes in comparison between 1990 and 2010.

In 1990, most of the children were walking to school, for more than 12 millions. Being a car passenger, about 4.5 millions of children, is the lowest types during this period. However, there is no significant difference between those who cycling, taking bus or taking bus and walking. The number of trips for these methods are in between 5 to 7 millions.

In 2010, the number of trips for children as a car passenger reached a peak at approximately 11 millions. This is a strong rising rate compare between 1990 and 2010. However, the trips made by those who walking dropped remarkably, for about 6.5 millions. There is also a falling rate for the numbers of trips taken by those who cycling, walking and taking bus, or taking bus.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...illions. Being a car passenger, about 4.5 millions of children, is the lowest types during th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59009009009 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60885097326 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463963963964 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4910614107 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6363636364 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235906893997 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101614395891 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664533711598 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173872812735 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625950511325 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.