The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the world evolves, a multitude of nations has become more dependent on conventional fuel. Hence, a question is arising whether shifting focus from fossil fuel to the alternative resource, should be the first preference. It seems to me that prioritizing seeking sustainable energy is absolutely essential owing to several reasons.
One of the primary causes is that non-renewable energy associates with ecosystem degradation. To enumerate, using petrol, which considers a fossil fuel, to a car induces emit carbon dioxide. Smog-production pollutants damage the ozone layer as it becomes depleted so that this is injurious to public health. For example, by breathing polluted air, the respiratory tract will be irritated. In addition to environmental catastrophe, excavating soils for fossil fuels not only cause soil erosion but also contribute to deforestation that leads to imperilling natural habitats. Therefore, relying on conventional energy source will most probably have detrimental impacts widely.
To mitigate the risks of either environmental degradation or deforestation, alternative resources should be harnessed. Yet, the agenda of a wide range of nations embrace other priorities, such as poverty. Hence, the devastating consequence of fossil fuels requires developing a safer alternative as it is much import as other issues. For instance, solar power could be efficacious as it might be used as a safe alternative. As a result, if countries endeavoured to put using renewable energy, a multitude of problems would be ameliorated.
In conclusion, it appears to me that using non-conventional power to fossil fuels should have more priority since it has as significant as other issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...oritizing seeking sustainable energy is absolutely essential owing to several reasons. One of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64341085271 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33320713661 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8766730745 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215684565897 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642007812395 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597711970582 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129177784546 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406204573449 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.